The people's voice of reason
On Wednesday, U.S. Senator Katie Britt (R-Alabama) questioned Chair of the U.S. Federal Reserve (the Fed) Jerome Powell during a Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee hearing. She voiced her concerns over the long-term debt proposed rule and instituting it prior to the full implementation of the Basel III Endgame proposal.
"Chair Powell, I have repeatedly talked about my concern with [the] long-term debt proposal and just think that it has not been well thought through," said Senator Britt. "First, I have concerns that it blatantly undermines the tailoring requirement. And on that note, do you believe that (S.) 2155 will be applicable to the long-term debt requirement?"
"I think it applies to everything," said Chairman Powell. "And on the long-term debt requirement, you know, we have voluminous comments that we're looking at carefully and thinking through the process of what to do about them."
Britt charged that in addition to undermining the tailoring requirement for financial institutions enacted by Congress in S. 2155, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act, the proposed rule also lacks a proper cost-benefit analysis.
Senator Britt went further asking if it would be "inappropriate to move forward with the long-term debt proposal, finalizing that rule, prior to Basel III [Endgame] being finalized as well?"
"I can't give you a clear answer on that," answered Powell. "It will depend. Basel III won't be finally finalized for some time..."
Senator Britt has previously questioned federal regulators on the controversial Basel III Endgame proposed rule which she warned could be harmful to the economy. Sen. Britt again highlighted the negative impact of a revised Basel III on commodity markets.
"[O]ur agriculture industry is one in five jobs in the state of Alabama, it's 20% of our economy," Senator Britt said. "I am a big believer [that] food security is national security, and the proposal would increase hedging costs by 80%, meaning banks would be far less likely, or inclined, to offer clearing services. This could have a detrimental effect to our agriculture community and increase other costs providing food and fiber for our nation. When you look at inputs such as feed, seed, fertilizer prices, those have skyrocketed and prices have ended up just getting passed down to the consumer. I mean, grocery prices are up 21% since January [2021]."
Chair Powell declined to mention the specific changes the Federal Reserve was considering to the proposal but did note he was "very well aware of and very focused" on the multitude of issues from across industries raised on Basel III Endgame.
Senator Britt concluded her remarks by reminding Chair Powell that "finding solutions to expanding affordable childcare is a top priority . . . and it is something that I know a number of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle share an interest in and believe is an important issue as well."
The "Basel III endgame" is a proposal for stricter bank capital requirements aimed at ensuring the stability of big banks. Proponents believe that the proposal would modify large bank capital requirements to better reflect underlying risks and increase the consistency of how banks measure their risks. The changes would implement the final components of the Basel III agreement. The proposal would apply to banks with $100 billion in assets or more and to smaller firms with "significant" trading activities.
Sens. Britt and Tommy Tuberville (R-Alabama) signed a letter back in November raising concerns that the stricter capital requirements on banks will lead to a tightening of credit needed by both businesses and consumers. Credit is already more expensive due to a series of interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve over the last two years. If it also becomes harder to get, many small businesses will be unable to get new financing, perhaps leading to larger problems in the economy problems.
To connect with the author of this story or to comment, email brandonmreporter@gmail.com.
Reader Comments(0)